<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Episode 36 &#8211; Tweeting into 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://digitalcampus.tv/2009/01/15/episode-36-tweeting-into-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digitalcampus.tv/2009/01/15/episode-36-tweeting-into-2009/</link>
	<description>A biweekly discussion of how digital media and technology are affecting learning, teaching, and scholarship at colleges, universities, libraries, and museums.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 21:50:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Las humanidades digitales en 2008 (1) &#171; Clionauta: Blog de Historia</title>
		<link>http://digitalcampus.tv/2009/01/15/episode-36-tweeting-into-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-589</link>
		<dc:creator>Las humanidades digitales en 2008 (1) &#171; Clionauta: Blog de Historia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 10:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalcampus.tv/?p=69#comment-589</guid>
		<description>[...] posts acerca de Twitter como vehículo para la conversación académica, y un reciente  podcast de Digital Campus presenta una discusión entre los tweeters Dan Cohen y Tom Scheinfeldt frente al escéptico Mills [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] posts acerca de Twitter como vehículo para la conversación académica, y un reciente  podcast de Digital Campus presenta una discusión entre los tweeters Dan Cohen y Tom Scheinfeldt frente al escéptico Mills [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Salt-Box &#187; Teaching Carnival 3.1</title>
		<link>http://digitalcampus.tv/2009/01/15/episode-36-tweeting-into-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-511</link>
		<dc:creator>The Salt-Box &#187; Teaching Carnival 3.1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 07:42:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalcampus.tv/?p=69#comment-511</guid>
		<description>[...] Digital Campus podcast also covers the relevant [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Digital Campus podcast also covers the relevant [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digital Humanities in 2008, Part I &#171; Digital Scholarship in the Humanities</title>
		<link>http://digitalcampus.tv/2009/01/15/episode-36-tweeting-into-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-510</link>
		<dc:creator>Digital Humanities in 2008, Part I &#171; Digital Scholarship in the Humanities</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 11:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalcampus.tv/?p=69#comment-510</guid>
		<description>[...] written a couple of great posts about Twitter as a vehicle for scholarly conversation, and a recent Digital Campus podcast features a discussion among Tweeters Dan Cohen and Tom Scheinfeldt and skeptic Mills [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] written a couple of great posts about Twitter as a vehicle for scholarly conversation, and a recent Digital Campus podcast features a discussion among Tweeters Dan Cohen and Tom Scheinfeldt and skeptic Mills [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Scheinfeldt</title>
		<link>http://digitalcampus.tv/2009/01/15/episode-36-tweeting-into-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-496</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Scheinfeldt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 16:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalcampus.tv/?p=69#comment-496</guid>
		<description>Interesting. I was wondering if competition from Evernote, which has really taken off among iPhone users, was part of the reason Google killed notebook.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. I was wondering if competition from Evernote, which has really taken off among iPhone users, was part of the reason Google killed notebook.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Francoeur</title>
		<link>http://digitalcampus.tv/2009/01/15/episode-36-tweeting-into-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-495</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Francoeur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 16:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalcampus.tv/?p=69#comment-495</guid>
		<description>Seems like Zoho Notebook and Evernote are trying to scoop up Google Notebook users: both services now offer a tool to import Google Notebook data.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems like Zoho Notebook and Evernote are trying to scoop up Google Notebook users: both services now offer a tool to import Google Notebook data.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LAM</title>
		<link>http://digitalcampus.tv/2009/01/15/episode-36-tweeting-into-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-492</link>
		<dc:creator>LAM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 16:05:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalcampus.tv/?p=69#comment-492</guid>
		<description>I appreciated the discussion in this episode about what happens if a web service is canceled or goes out of business. I was recently involved in a discussion about whether to use open-source software like Omeka or a proprietary software. One of the arguments for the proprietary software was that an open-source project might lose funding, and so whatever investment had been put into it would be lost. My argument was that businesses making proprietary software were just as likely to go out of business, and that open-source software at least uses open standards (like Dublin Core) that would let you get the data out if you ever needed it. Unfortunately the company in question was privately owned; otherwise its stock prices for the year might have been convincing. I think it will be a while yet before the virtue of open source and open standards are widely appreciated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appreciated the discussion in this episode about what happens if a web service is canceled or goes out of business. I was recently involved in a discussion about whether to use open-source software like Omeka or a proprietary software. One of the arguments for the proprietary software was that an open-source project might lose funding, and so whatever investment had been put into it would be lost. My argument was that businesses making proprietary software were just as likely to go out of business, and that open-source software at least uses open standards (like Dublin Core) that would let you get the data out if you ever needed it. Unfortunately the company in question was privately owned; otherwise its stock prices for the year might have been convincing. I think it will be a while yet before the virtue of open source and open standards are widely appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Lester</title>
		<link>http://digitalcampus.tv/2009/01/15/episode-36-tweeting-into-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-491</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Lester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 21:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalcampus.tv/?p=69#comment-491</guid>
		<description>Hey Digital Campus crew, I&#039;m digging the new design!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Digital Campus crew, I&#8217;m digging the new design!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
